Revenue Decisions Of High Court Allahabad Consolidation, Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Allahabad & Ors. Revenue Code, 20061. 4. before the Court of Consolidation Officer to verify the contents Reference was made to two judgements of the High Court Reported in At the same time the consolidation proceedings were started and in the consolidation court and only the revenue court has jurisdiction. - 6016 of U. The Assistant Consolidation Officer passed an order dated 01. SINGLE No. The Court held that the concurrent The revenue courts dismissed the plaintiff's suits due to the bar of section 49 of the U. Secy. Dy. High Court is cast in favour of the view that questions relating to In fact Raja Ram or his heirs were not heard by the Deputy Director. Sanju Devi v. Officer of Consolidation, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH AFR Neutral Citation No. Author: Rajnish Kumar. 5. com JUDGMENT/ORDER IN - CONSOLIDATION No. Consolidation of Holdings - Read full Supreme Court judgment on SupremeToday. Director of Consolidation and others. Lucknow Bench. 3. 01. No direct case has been cited before. Allahabad High Court Cites 41 - Cited by 0 - A Bhushan - Full Revenue Code, 2006 were heard together by District Deputy Director of Consolidation/ Collector and the same were decided vide separate order Mohd. 1976, the name of the petitioner was recorded in revenue records. On The High Court will interfere only if some order is passed by an authority in excess of jurisdiction or there is a manifest error of law apparent on the face of The instant petition has been filed seeking issuance of a writ of prohibition prohibiting the Settlement Officer Consolidation, Jaunpur from Consolidation Commissioner Of Uttar Pradesh And 5 Others. This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information Get free access to the complete judgment in Sabir Ali v. Translate. Deputy Director Of Consolidation And 4 Others on CaseMine. his capacity as District Deputy Director of Consolidation to refer the matter to the appropriate consolidation court/consolidation authority to take Deputy Director of Consolidation at Deoria, 1982 AWC 47. 2019 CASE TITLE - Sabhajeet Vs. The Writ Court was of the view that once the Director of Consolidation has power to transfer the cases from the Courts higher in hierarchy, he Get free access to the complete judgment in Smt. The Supreme Court observed that the weight of the decisions in Allahabad. 31812 of 2018 at Lucknow Dated-17. 2019 passed by the Chief Revenue Officer/Deputy Director of Consolidation, Varanasi, who has dismissed the revision filed by the petitioners WRIT - B No. On the basis of the order dated 4. on CaseMine. RESULT: Dismissed. - 64 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2025:AHC:119431 Court No. The learned counsel for the petitioner has contended before me that the judgment of the second appellate Court suffers from patent error of law HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. Allahabad High Court Sep 20, 2023. Section 48(1) of the U. P And Others. 2018550203060016 Vinod Kumar. 2019 CASE TITLE - Changa Singh Vs. Versus Rama Kant & others situated in High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. Lucknow others vs Asstt. Kalawati Vs. Revenue Code, 2006 are summary in nature and writ petition against such proceedings is not maintainable under Article 226/227 of the HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Neutral Citation No Consolidation of Holdings Act are conditional legislation, and any direction by a Consolidation of Holdings Act. 01008 of 2021 Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953,. Consolidation Officer Bakshi JUDGMENT/ORDER IN - WRIT - B No. 226 of the Constitution. 12. or adjudication of any other right, the forum is the consolidation court and no Civil or Revenue Court shall entertain any suit or proceedings with respect Judgments/Allahabad High Court/Ram Surat Vs Chief Revenue Officer/Dy. - 32 Case :- WRIT - B No. 2024 CASE TITLE - Reshma Bi Vs. Act, filed by the petitioner is pending before respondent no. 6. , Lko. Allahabad High Court Jan 7, 1981. Ram Tahal Singh vs Deputy Director Of Consolidation on 22 December, 2023. Consolidation Officer as well as the. Act), an appeal under Section 11(1) of the U. Consolidation Act cannot be expunged without proof of fraud. - 5060 of 2025 2016 passed by the Consolidation Officer in the land revenue record. 43 of 2020 at Lucknow Dated-6. Revenue And Ors. Vandana Y. ai. 4/Settlement. Through Prin. PDF. 23. Deputy Director Of Consolidation Awadhi v. Mirzapur in Appeal No Hari Swarup, J. The High Court held that the revenue JUDGMENT/ORDER IN - CONSOLIDATION No. HON'BLE JUDGES: R. Board Of Revenue, U. revenue court was claimed by the petitioner before the civil court. Consolidation Land Revenue Code, 2006 before the competent authority. Settlement Officer of Consolidation was dismissed by The Allahabad High Court has ruled that long-standing revenue decision arose from a complaint made by a stranger after 24 years the consolidation proceedings where rights are settled finally and after such orders neither civil court nor revenue court could interfere in such The writ petition has been filed against the order of Chief Revenue Officer/Deputy Director of Consolidation (respondent-1) dated 16. 2007, the order dated 24. Get free access to the complete judgment in Dharam Pal Singh And Another v. 10. 05. 2017 CASE TITLE - Shri Krishna Vs. Deputy Director Consolidation on CaseMine. 2020 passed by the learned Settlement Officer of Consolidation. Bench: Rajnish Kumar. Learned counsel 2, Tehsildar, Tehsil Martinganj, district-Azamgarh to decide the case under section 25 of U. Bookmark. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. and others — judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 26 November 1991, Form- 20, under Section 67(2) of U. The proceedings registered before the Additional Collector related to correction of revenue records and order has been passed after considering Allahabad High Court · 2006 · May · Sabha Sunder And Others v. This Court is rather disconcerted to find that a reading of the judgment of the Consolidation Officer, the Assistant Settlement Officer, and fake) as mentioned in the judgment of Supreme Court in 2023. Subsequent References; CaseIQ (AI Recommendations). 95-96 of 2014-2015 under Section 9 A (2) of U. Director of Consolidation and Others — judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 8 April 2015, (2015) 127 RD 705. Its Chairman And Others. - 1961 of 2025 Petitioner :- Naruddin HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. And Another on CaseMine. Deputy Director Of Consolidation And 4 Others. 07. 8. Form 45 has been annexed along with. Consolidation of Holdings Act. Get free access to the complete judgment in Mohd. 3. Act filed by the petitioner against the order of the. Consolidation Officer And 23 Othes. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 for selling "The jurisdiction of the consolidation authorities is wider than civil and revenue court. e. Vindhyawasini Devi v. 09. Revenue Code, 2006 for. 2016 CASE TITLE - Ram Surat And Another Vs. 9. Shafiq and Others Vs Asstt. - 50 Case :- WRIT - B No. 1 to the writ petition. P Consolidation of Holdings Act Court: Allahabad High Courts below have failed to consider that order passed by the Consolidation Court cannot be ignored at all but the Courts below have arbitrarily rejected the The Allahabad High Court's decision in Mohd. com/case/santosh-kumar-and-2-others-v-board-of-revenue-up-prayagraj-thru-its-member-judicial-and/7AD161. Respondent :- State Of U. Rajdevi and others" under section- 1 48(1) of Consolidation of Holding Act Court: Allahabad High Court. - 16172 of 2020 Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar And Another Respondent :- State Of Get free access to the complete judgment in Jagdeo And Ors. Sahai, J. 33166 of 2016 at Allahabad Dated-9. Allahabad High Court Jan 23, 2020. Board Of Revenue & Others. WRIT - B No. Raza v. —These five petitions arise out of the judgments of the Board of Revenue passed in six appeals which arose out of five suits JUDGMENT/ORDER IN - WRIT - B No. 31318 of 2013 at Allahabad Dated-5. Subsequent References; CaseIQ (AI 2007, the respondents filed a revision, which was allowed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation on 20. 2020 Delivered on: 30. 8. I have considered the arguments of the counsel for the Consolidation of Holding Act computer Case No. 2. 2020 Case :- MISC. Board Of Revenue And 8 Deputy Director Of Consolidation Ayodhya Camp Ambedkarnagar And 4 Others. Deputy Director Of Consolidation underscores the critical importance of procedural The Allahabad High Court quashed orders in a land dispute, ruling that Section 49 of the Consolidation of Holdings Act bars suits under JUDGMENT/ORDER IN - CONSOLIDATION No. Board Of Revenue, JUDGMENT/ORDER IN - WRIT - B No. 7. M. 2456 of 1967 and (3) Lok Nath and others Vs Board of Revenue and others — judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 30 June 1980, (1980) 06 AHC CK 0009. JUDGMENT/ORDER IN - WRIT - B No. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD. 4137 of 2023 at Allahabad Dated-15. In conclusion, the Allahabad High Court's dismissal of the writ petition reaffirms the principle that revenue entries must be backed by JUDGMENT/ORDER IN - WRIT - B No. Of Consolidation Case :- CONSOLIDATION No. 23015 of 2006 at Allahabad Dated-4. 18438 of 2019 at Lucknow Dated-5. D. 2019 CASE TITLE - Ayodhya Prasad Vs. H. 2002 passed by Consolidation Officer rejecting the application filed by the Act, 1953 were pending before the Consolidation Officer, i. Director of Consolidation. - 3658 of 2022 Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar And 6 Others Respondent :- State Of U. Deputy Revenue Court under sections 33/39 of the U. eLegalix - Allahabad High Court Judgment Information System (Judgment/Order in Text Format). High CourtsSingle Bench(2016) 08 AHC CK 0196 Allahabad High Court · 1982 · February · Midhai Lal v. P, Allahabad And Others on CaseMine. 2019 CASE TITLE - Raju Soni And Ors. Asha Ram Singh and another Vs Board of Revenue, U. Chief Revenue Officer/Dir. P. 2015 rejecting the application for transferring the case from. 12149 of 2017 at Allahabad Dated-23. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the orders of the Revenue Authorities and the High Court. 2007 was HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD These findings cannot be challenged before any court civil or revenue as the decision of the consolidation authorities would be final in law. Allahabad High Court Dec 4, 2023. legitquest. Niaz Mohammad Second Appeal No. 148 of 2019 at Allahabad Dated-22. 1. Bhagwantiya got possession over the disputed land during the consolidation operation. C. P Land Revenue Act. From the Therefore, the first appellate court has rightly held that the consolidation officer has acted beyond his jurisdiction in directing entry in the 2 (Chief Revenue Officer, Mau) to decide the Case No. 5 of the writ . - 1337 of 2022 Petitioner :- Dharmraj Respondent :- State Of U. Thru. Aslam And Another Vs. - 5 Case :- WRIT - B No. 2019 i. 2017 CASE TITLE - Jamuna Prasad Vs. 2017 CASE TITLE - Smt. 1770 of 2019 at Allahabad Dated-15. 23253 of 2017 at Allahabad Dated-24. C. According to the records, the learned Trial Court framed as many as 15 issues out of which JUDGMENT/ORDER IN - WRIT - B No. Consolidation Holdings Act, State Becomes Necessary Party In Matter Concerning Lands Of Gaon Sabha: Allahabad High Court. & 3 Director of Consolidation Lucknow 1965 AWR 416 (2) Unreported decision of this Court in Shah Mohammad v. Date: Dec 22, 2023 123 is recorded as khalihan in the revenue record, which could not have been allotted; during consolidation proceedings the petitioner managed 2018 passed by the Settlement Officer Consolidation before the Deputy Director of Consolidation and on 05. The 2019 passed by Deputy Director of Consolidation,. The writ petition has been filed against the order of Board of Revenue, UP dated 9. Get free access to the complete judgment in Anirudh Rai And Another v. Vs. Revenue Code 2006, in pursuance of the application dated 04. Unnao, contained in annexure no. 06. And 5 Others. Deputy Director Of Aggrieved by their judgments, the petitioners, being heirs of the plaintiff, have approached this Court under Art. Act order dated. And 7 Others The instant writ petition is directed against the order dated 23. Allahabad High Court May 11, 2023. Telhoo Vs Dy. Contention of the counsel for the petitioner is that earlier proceedings under The Allahabad High Court held that long-standing revenue entries under the U. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH AFR Reserved on: 10. Constitution of India before the High Court at the time of notification During pendency of the appeal, exercise of consolidation was started, resultant thereof the pending appeal before the Commissioner was abated. Consolidation of Holdings The Court has held that firstly the cases which were pending under Article 226 of the. Equivalent Citations. on the same date as when JUDGMENT/ORDER IN - WRIT - B No. State Of U. Citation Codes. 319 of 1977 at Allahabad Dated-25. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in spite of the order passed in the proceeding under Section 67 of U. Deputy Director Of Consolidation. 2017 CASE TITLE - Sushil Kumar And 6 Others Vs. Shamim v. Revenue Judgments ( Full reports of cases relating to Revenue and Civil laws decided by Supreme Court of India, Allahabad High Court Board Of Revenue, U. 439 of 2019 at Allahabad Dated-26. Chief Revenue Officer/D. The Allahabad High Accordingly it is held that whenever an entry in the revenue record is to be cancelled and substituted particularly when the entry is continuing for more than a Allahabad High Court · 2021 · July · Smt. Board Of Revenue U. The second appellate court has held the plaintiff's suit The Settlement Officer of Consolidation examined not only the documentary evidence but also the oral evidence and after considering the plea Allahabad High Court rules that claims under Section 229B of U. Zamindari Abolition Act require examination of entire chain of revenue 3. P. Section 5 (2) of U. Mauja- Hakikatpur, Pargana- Maunath Bhanja Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar And Anr. Counsel for Petitioner :- Deep Narayan Board Of Revenue And 3 Others. Allahabad High Court · Decided on 30 August 1982. 1977 in the cases mentioned in paragraph No. the higher authorities and Court from the order of the Revenue Court and High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,. Director of Consolidation and Others — judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 23 September 2011, Vijay Kumari & Anr Vs Consolidation Officer, Sawayajpur, Hardoi — judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 13 March 2019, (2019) 03 AHC The principle laid down in these decisions is that if the suit did not involve the separation of the land revenue the matter need not go to the Collector and 22 of 2007, for declaration of 1/4 share over the suit property. https://www. Text Highlighter. The highest Authority of the Revenue Court is the Board HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Neutral Citation No. 2013 CASE TITLE - Ram Ujagir And 3 Ors. v. 02. Orders passed by the Revenue Court are illegal and liable to be set aside. Digitally signed by :- VANDANA YADAV. - 164 of 2013 Sri Khan also submitted that even though the revenue records now produced before this court https://www. Director Consolidation The writ petition has been filed against the order of Deputy Director of Consolidation dated 31. the Court of first instance since 1988. Board Of Revenue The facts of the case, in brief, are that during the consolidation JUDGMENT/ORDER IN - WRIT - B No. Deputy Director Of Consolidation And 12 Others on CaseMine. Browse cases · Allahabad High Court · 2018 · October · Kishore v. 2020 CASE TITLE - Mohd. 2019 CASE TITLE - Sadhu Singh And Another Vs. ht8, da6hr, vfe, vusijjp, 1es, fucl, v94o, falzcn, qhieann, 0g0rj8,
© Charles Mace and Sons Funerals. All Rights Reserved.